Every day, millions of people worldwide are forced to face the high costs of an essential service for human survival: medical care. This significant and growing issue has led to severe emotional distress, financial struggles, and health problems for a large majority of families and individuals.

Due to this, the debate over the most ethical approach to address this large-scale situation has become increasingly broad. Some argue that universal healthcare is a moral obligation that ensures all individuals receive necessary medical treatment, regardless of income. Others argue that a government-funded system is economically unsustainable and might lower the quality of care.

This discussion brings up many questions about whether healthcare is a human right or a personal responsibility, as well as what the government’s role should be in providing medical services. While the concerns about a government-funded system being economically unsustainable or even lowering the quality of care are reasonable, common ground can be found in the shared goal of public health improvement.

With the proper support, it is possible to maintain both quality and accessibility. Although there are a variety of reasonable approaches for this urgent situation, the most ethical and effective solution in response to the healthcare access issue would be universal healthcare.

Image Credit: Kaboopics.com from Pexels

Take the Quiz: Religion, Schools, and Equality

Religion in Schools: Teaching Respect, Not Bias.

Can We Afford It?

One of the most common arguments against the idea of universal healthcare is that it is economically unsustainable. Essentially, the questions regarding the true effectiveness of universal healthcare ask whether or not this solution would truly make a positive impact, or if it would cause the system to financially struggle over time.

Some medical ethicists believe that a government-funded healthcare system would only raise taxes significantly and increase public spending, leaving the healthcare sector with even more serious problems than ever before.

Although this is a valid concern, if universal healthcare is managed with care and caution, it could potentially reduce costs in the healthcare industry. Proven by The New England Journal of Medicine, it has been found that the United States, a country without universal healthcare, spends significantly more on healthcare administration per person compared to Canada, a country with universal healthcare (Campbell et al).

This study shows that an efficient universal healthcare system would indeed create a decrease in the overall cost of care.

Additionally, universal healthcare could even improve preventative care by giving all individuals regular access to health professionals and early treatments, which may reduce the need for expensive emergency care and chronic disease management later on. Over time, this could reduce financial pressure on hospitals and insurance systems by focusing on long-term health outcomes rather than short-term treatments.

Overall, this goes to show that while the cost of execution for the idea may be high, the long-term saving and improvement of health outcomes show that universal healthcare could as well be a good financial solution.

Image Credit: Zakir Rushanly from Pexels

Will It Hurt the Quality of Care?

Another common argument against universal healthcare is that it would significantly weaken the general quality of care. Some believe that if universal healthcare is taken into action, there would be a large increase in demand, straining resources and overwhelming healthcare professionals.

Although universal healthcare can weaken quality of care in some cases, it can also be maintained, and even advanced, if it is approached with proper control.

For example, a study in The Journal of General Internal Medicine found that adults in Switzerland, a country with universal healthcare, “received 69% of recommended preventive care and 83% of care for cardiovascular risk” using standardized tools (Cornuz et al, p. 730).

This study demonstrates that with proper efficiency, organization, and care, universal healthcare systems can provide top-quality care that citizens might need, regardless of the increase in demand. Focusing on more regular check-ups and early treatment could help people stay healthier overall. This could lead to fewer serious health problems later on, which would help reduce pressure on hospitals and doctors.

With the proper planning and support, it is possible to give everyone access to healthcare without lowering the quality.

Image Credit: SHVETS production from Pexels

Valid Concerns Still Matter

The concerns expressed regarding universal healthcare leading to serious problems in the healthcare industry are reasonable. Many people worry that expanding access to medical care could potentially lead to financial troubles, an increase in demand, and overwhelmed healthcare workers.

These fears are genuine and represent serious challenges encountered by numerous nations that took on the action of universal healthcare. For example, in some countries where universal healthcare was implemented too quickly, without caution or the necessary amount of care, both patients and medical professionals were forced to face the overwhelming consequences.

These concerns are extremely valid, and the arguments made against universal healthcare as the most ethical and effective solution are equally relevant. However, it is unreasonable to argue that universal healthcare is a solution that should not be taken into consideration at all.

Image Credit: Sora Shimazaki from Pexels

Why It Still Deserves to Be Taken Into Consideration

Regardless of individual beliefs or opinions about the negative effects of universal healthcare, it is important to think about the vast number of people who simply cannot afford to seek medical care for serious health issues due to the high costs associated with even the smallest amount of assistance.

According to a study published in The National Library of Medicine, “Financial barriers to healthcare worsened health status and increased use of ED, hospitalization, and economic burden” (Horras et al).

This shows that ignoring the high costs of an essential need for human life often leads to worse outcomes for a large majority of individuals.

With high healthcare costs, many tend to avoid visiting a medical professional, even when facing serious health concerns, just to avoid financial difficulties. It is important to note that not everyone can afford the high costs of a hospital visit, and their circumstances must be considered when developing a solution to healthcare access.

Image Credit: olia danilevich from Pexels

Conclusion

This all goes to show that providing universal healthcare systems would in fact be the most ethical and effective approach in regard to addressing the global healthcare access issue.

If carefully thought-out actions are taken, millions of people worldwide would finally be provided with more accessible, professional healthcare that is essential for human survival. This action would not only ensure individuals are provided with the necessary treatment that they need, but it would also increase overall happiness rates across the globe.