I know before that I said that I was fully against AI but as the days and weeks go on, I don't know if that's entirely true anymore. I always keep it real and let's be real honest for a second when discussing this topic. I don't know about y'all but I've heard some banger tracks with AI. I wouldn't say that it's a threat but many would say that AI is taking away the art of music with a simple computer generation and I gotta say, that is also kinda very true. AI is truly going to be our downfall BUT is AI generated music a threat or masterpiece? And is it so bad? Today we will be talking about just that while also keeping an open mind with how we use and see AI.
Image Credit: Anna Shvets from Pexels
AI-generated music has been at a constant shift from technological novelty into a huge industry force, showing itself off as an existential threat to many creators and a so-called masterpiece for production. This debate is no longer about if algorithms can write a good song, but more about how they are permanently altering the economic society, legal, and creative landscape of modern culture. While there are tools like Suno and Udio which allow anyone and everyone the ability to generate broadcast-quality tracks from a text prompt in minutes, maybe even seconds, they have ignited powerful legal battles over topics like copyright theft and triggered a mass shift of algorithmically optimized content and music across some major digital streaming platforms.
Image Credit: Egor Komarov from Pexels
There are roughly over 50,000 new AI tracks that are uploaded to streaming platforms daily. This large volume floods curated playlists. It compromises the fixed royalty pools, siphoning payouts away from real musicians and artists. According to Adam Holmes, Bad actors are using AI to manipulate the streaming data algorithm. In a notable case prosecuted by the U.S. government, a creator managed and succeeded using AI tracks and streaming computers/bots to siphon $10 million in fraudulent royalties. That's a lot of royalties if you ask me.
Image Credit: Martin Sanchez from Unsplash
Fun fact: Optimists and technology-forward producers see AI not much of a replacement for the musician, but as an ultimate collaborative instrument for the artist itself.
Big record labels such as Universal and Warner, while alongside indie rights groups like Merlin, have progressively taken deals to license artist repertoires to well known AI generation startups for proper remuneration and consent mechanisms. Advocacy groups such as the American Federation of Musicians move and seem to continue to aggressively lobby lawmakers for strict transparency laws, explicit training consent, and legal protections against predatory voice cloning. There are many academic studies, including data from Carnegie Mellon University, that continue to show that fully machine-made music still often lacks the complex structural variation and nuanced emotional feeling that humans naturally put into art, creating a sense of deep emotion toward the art.
Image Credit: Luke Jones from Unsplash
Finally, AI-generated music is showing to be a highly disruptive topic and mirror human listening habits. This reveals that while technology can effortlessly simulate common genre aesthetics, the irreplaceable masterpiece is within the unique vulnerability and the lived experiences of the human creators. Now let me ask, is AI-generated music truly the treat? Or is it a blessing?
