High school is sometimes depicted as a time of social connection, learning, and development. But for disabled pupils, it can also be a place where nearly every experience is influenced by ableism, discrimination favoring non-disabled people. Though certain obstacles like the lack of wheelchair ramps are evident, several others are interwoven throughout the fabric of school life—from grading systems to classroom equipment to daily speech. The first step toward building a more inclusive atmosphere is acknowledging these covert types of ableism.
Let us slide into your dms 🥰
Get notified of top trending articles like this one every week! (we won't spam you)Physical Barriers: Far Beyond Just Stairs
Accessible infrastructure is the most obvious manifestation of ableism in schools. Many high schools continue to have structures with steps but no elevators or ramps, making it impossible for students with mobility aids to move around independently. Many times, classroom layouts do not fit wheelchairs or students needing extra space, and some schools lack accessible toilets, so students are forced to travel to another floor or even a different building.
Moreover, the lack of quiet or sensory-friendly areas causes neurodivergent students to struggle in noisy, congested areas. These obstacles plainly indicate that disabled individuals are an afterthought rather than a priority.

Image Credit: Alesia Kozik from Pexels

Take the Quiz: Which "The Summer I Turned Pretty" character are you most like?
Find out which character from the hit show "The Summer I Turned Pretty" is your personality twin!
Academic Policies That Punish Disability
Many conventional school rules inadvertently penalize disabled individuals even when they are working just as hard as their classmates. Participation grades, for instance, ignore those who communicate differently—such as autistic people, those with social anxiety, or students using assistive technology—while favoring extroverted, verbal children. Strict attendance rules sometimes ignore chronic illness or medical appointments, and timed exams penalize students with processing difficulties or who require more time.
Worse, many educators regard "fair" as "the same for everyone," rather than as offering personal accommodations. These regulations compel disabled students to work twice as hard just to fulfill the same expectations as their non-disabled classmates.

Image Credit: Polina from Pexels
Inaccessible Technology & Learning Resources
Though schools buy digital resources, they're not always meant for individuals with specific impairments. Online systems may not have screen-reader compatibility, therefore shunning visually impaired students, whereas films without captions are inaccessible for deaf or hard-of-hearing students.
PDFs not readable by text-to-speech software force dyslexic or visually impaired students to depend on others for access; clickers or applications utilized for tests are often not adaptable for students with motor impairments. Disabled individuals miss learning possibilities their classmates take for granted when technology is unavailable.

Image Credit: Luis Quintero from Pexels
The Language of Ableism
Most people are unaware that casual language strengthens negative stereotypes. Using controversial language/slurs employs disability as shorthand for "bad," whereas statements like "You don’t look disabled" suggest disability has to be apparent to be legitimate.
Assumptions that a struggling student is "just lazy" dismiss real challenges; narratives of "overcoming disability" frame disability as a tragedy to be conquered rather than a natural component of human diversity. These attitudes and vocabulary foster a culture in which disabled people believe themselves to be outsiders in their own school.

Image by Mikhail Nilov from Pexels
Progressing Toward Inclusion
Although it won't vanish suddenly, schools can start to break ableism down. First, instead of guessing, educators and administrators should listen to disabled individuals about their requirements. Policies like grading, attendance, tech usage should be examined for hidden biases by schools, and teachers should receive disability inclusion instruction beyond mere legal compliance. Most importantly, accommodations should be normalized so that they are not seen as "special treatment" but as required access.
High school should be a place where all students—not just those who fit a limited definition of "normal"—can flourish. Confronting ableism in all its guises will help us to develop schools that really benefit everyone.